|
Open content, coined by analogy by having "open source," (though technically it is actually share-alike) describes any kind of originative function including articles, pictures, audio, & videos that is published around a format that explicitly allows the copying of the data. Content may be either in the public domain or under a license rather a GNU Free Documentation License. "Open content" is as well another time wont to describe content that may be modified by anyone; no closed class action, prefer the commercial encyclopaedia publisher, responsible all the redaction.
It's conceivable that a foremost documented out break of Open Content was by using a Royal Society, where it aspired toward trading tools sharing through a world as a public enterprise. A commonality is hard to forget about. A words "open content" were 1st collectively in that context by David Wiley, so the postgraduate at Brigham Young University, who founded a OpenContent plan & conjointly a foremost content-specific (non-programs) license within 1998 using input from Eric Raymond, Tim O'Reilly, and others.
Prefer a debate between a titles "open source" and "free software", open content materials can too exist when described as free content, although technically they describe different items. E.g., a Open Directory is open content but is non loose content. A independent difference between licenses is a definition of freedom; a select few licenses attempt to maximize a freedom of a lot expected recipients later when others maximize the freedom of the initial recipient. Good deal of the ideals of the open source movement was led per Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). 1 such application is their Open Courseware (see beneath).
A related term most common content is now and then wont to refer to Creative Commons-licensed works. This requires when a Most common Content task, which is an attempt to collect when numbers of such works when imaginable.
|